It didn’t go; in fact it’s worse than ever.
For play not to be innate goes against the very core
Principles of Playwork and everything I’ve ever been taught about it.
Heck the very first Playwork Principle states, and I
quote “The impulse to play is innate”.And it stands to logic that it is innate. Yet at the same time it’s such a big concept that I wouldn’t know where to begin. I think I’ll explore the concept of it not being innate first and then let you guys find the flaws in what I’ve said and what I’m probably about to say.
I use the word happiness in its most general definition, that being any form of positive emotion.
On that note, if such a train of thought was to be followed and play was considered the method by which we seek positive emotion, following out first good feeling as a foetus or baby. It could be said that not only are there infinitely more types of play than previously conceived (as now anything that makes us happy is a form of play) but also; that play is nurtures means to natures end. Nurture here referring to anything that isn’t biological.
But on that thought play could be innate, a natural process
that is only triggered upon our first good feeling. Much in the same way that puberty
doesn’t occur until later in life. The understanding of biological processes
that don’t occur from birth could rectify my conundrum.
Yet my mind remains unsatisfied.
No comments:
Post a Comment